Comments on: Speaking of which… http://www.xulplanet.com/ndeakin/item/9 Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:58:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3 By: davide ficano http://www.xulplanet.com/ndeakin/item/9#comment-340 davide ficano Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:26:57 +0000 http://www.xulplanet.com/ndeakin/item/9#comment-340 Very useful, thanks :-) Very useful, thanks :-)

]]> By: Ian McKellar http://www.xulplanet.com/ndeakin/item/9#comment-341 Ian McKellar Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:43:09 +0000 http://www.xulplanet.com/ndeakin/item/9#comment-341 You're my hero! :) Ian You’re my hero! :)

Ian

]]> By: Gomita http://www.xulplanet.com/ndeakin/item/9#comment-353 Gomita Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:30:44 +0000 http://www.xulplanet.com/ndeakin/item/9#comment-353 Hi, Thanks for the update. I recently found that XULPlanet's XPCOM references lack some informations compared with the original IDL comments. For example, the reference of nsIWebBrowserPersist lacks "No special persistence behaviour.", which is the description of "PERSIST_FLAGS_NONE". For more details, please compare: http://www.xulplanet.com/references/xpcomref/ifaces/nsIWebBrowserPersist.html http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/embedding/components/webbrowserpersist/public/nsIWebBrowserPersist.idl If this problem will be fixed, XULPlanet's reference would be perfect! Hi,

Thanks for the update.
I recently found that XULPlanet’s XPCOM references lack some informations compared with the original IDL comments.
For example, the reference of nsIWebBrowserPersist lacks “No special persistence behaviour.”, which is the description of “PERSIST_FLAGS_NONE”.

For more details, please compare:
http://www.xulplanet.com/references/xpcomref/ifaces/nsIWebBrowserPersist.html
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/embedding/components/webbrowserpersist/public/nsIWebBrowserPersist.idl

If this problem will be fixed, XULPlanet’s reference would be perfect!

]]>